少年包青天

宮根誠司、『Mr.サンデー』政党記載漏れ謝罪時に見せた“他人事態度”が物議…過去にも“偉そうな謝り方”で疑われたMCの適性_我的网站

一 |     2月22日、宮根誠司と藤本万梨乃が司会を務める情報番組『Mr.サンデー』（フジテレビ系）で、衆院選に関する放送内容について謝罪した。    

    Shipping containers are loaded and unloaded onto ships at the Port of Los Angeles, California, on July 9, 2025. Photo: VCG
When even major US allies and trading partners are swept into Washington's alleged China-linked transshipment network, is the US still cracking down on its so-called illegal tariff evasion, or is it raising its "small yard, high fence" higher and tighten it further by wielding its tariff stick and extending tariff controls across normal global supply chains?
The White House on Thursday released a report identifying roughly 40 economies as participants in what it calls a "Shadow Transshipment Network", alleging that Chinese goods are being routed through third countries to evade higher US tariffs. The list stretches across Asia, Europe and the Americas and includes some of Washington's closest allies and largest trading partners.
Chinese experts said the report is partly aimed at defending Washington's tariff policy by shifting responsibility for its weakened impact onto other economies, while also pressuring them to follow US trade and origin rules. In effect, the US is trying to extend its unilateral trade restrictions beyond its own borders and deeper into global supply chains, they said.
Build 'higher fence'
The 25-page report claims that US import sourcing saw a "substantial reallocation" after the 2018 tariffs, as China's direct share declined and imports from identified transshipment economies rose. It alleges that some goods were routed through lower-tariff jurisdictions, where minor processing, relabeling, repackaging, re-invoicing or paperwork changes were used to create the appearance of a new national origin. 
However, the report itself acknowledges that alleged transshipment risks in several major economies are "embedded within broad legitimate trade flows." It also admitted that the post-2018 shift in US imports "does not establish" that all displaced Chinese trade was illegally transshipped and partly reflected "legitimate changes in production, investment, and sourcing."
False declarations of origin or simple repackaging can amount to tariff circumvention, but investing overseas, building factories abroad or sourcing components across borders are legitimate forms of supply-chain adjustment, experts said.
One purpose of the report is to portray Washington's tariff policy as effective while attributing its diminished impact to the responses of other economies, Zhou Mi, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation, told the Global Times. 
This allows Washington to shift responsibility onto other economies and put itself in a more favorable position in shaping the narrative around its tariff policy, Zhou said.
Cui Fan, a professor at the University of International Business and Economics, told the Global Times that US rules for determining country of origin are not fully aligned with those used by other economies. The latest move could pressure other countries to adopt US standards, but Cui said such an approach is unlikely to work.
"Countries formulate their rules of origin based on a range of factors, including the scale and technological conditions of their own industries," Cui said. "Industrial structures and the global division of labor cannot be reshaped simply through pressure from one country."
Harmonization of rules of origin - applying the same rules across countries regardless of purpose - "would facilitate the flow of international trade," according to WTO on its website. 
It has also warned that misuse of such rules may turn them into "a trade policy instrument" rather than merely a device supporting other trade policy measures, according to WTO.
Washington was pursuing hegemonic politics and unilateral bullying in the economic and trade sphere under the guise of "reciprocity", a spokesperson for China's Ministry of Commerce said when commenting on the US use of tariffs to pressure other countries into restricting economic and trade cooperation with China. 
Disrupting global supply chains

Cui said production and trade networks linking China with South Korea, Europe and other economies have taken shape over years of market-driven specialization. By lowering production and logistics costs and improving efficiency, these networks have benefited businesses and consumers across participating economies.
"The real challenge facing global trade today is not so-called illegal transshipment, but the continued damage that unilateralism and trade protectionism are inflicting on the multilateral trading system," Cui added.
Since returning to office, the Trump administration has made tariffs a centerpiece of its trade policy, rolling out sweeping "reciprocal tariffs" and other broad duties that have drawn widespread criticism at home and abroad. On Thursday, Washington announced new Section 232 tariffs on drones and their parts and components, further expanding the range of products subject to US tariffs.
US tariffs have themselves pushed companies to reconfigure supply chains. Washington is now citing those very adjustments as evidence of circumvention, effectively using the market fallout from its own tariff policy to justify further trade restrictions, Chinese experts noted.
International trade is based on mutual benefit, and sovereign countries have the legitimate right to conduct economic and trade cooperation independently, Cui said. "No country should interfere with normal global trade simply to advance its own unilateral interests."
The report broadens its scrutiny beyond routing and documentation to include China-origin inputs or components, Chinese ownership or financing, relationships with Chinese suppliers or manufacturers, China-based production steps and China-origin routing histories.
Analysts believed the latest move is more than simply making the existing "high fence" higher. By trying to bring more economies and a larger portion of global supply chains within the reach of US tariff enforcement, Washington attempted to make the "yard" itself much bigger.
Cui warned that sustained US pressure to reshape normal trade and supply-chain links could fragment mature regional production networks, and reduce the efficiency of global resource allocation, with the impact extending far beyond China-US trade given the wide range of economies named in the report.
Zhou noted that companies would be forced to redesign supply chains to manage rising policy risks, adding costs that could feed back into the US through higher inflation while creating broader frictions and instability for global trade.
。ただ、番組内での宮根の態度が物議を醸している。【画像あり】宮根誠司が謝らなかった『Mr.サンデー』の“政党記載漏れ” 　問題となったのは、15日放送の衆院選に関する特集企画だ。「番組内で11議席を獲得したチームみらいを取り上げました。

二 | その際、比例東京ブロックの政党別得票率の一覧表を紹介したのですが、日本保守党と減税日本・ゆうこく連合だけ記載がなく、放送直後からSNSで2党の記載漏れが指摘されていたのです。19日には番組公式サイトで謝罪文を掲載しましたが、今回の放送で改めて謝罪したかたちです」（スポーツ紙記者） 　番組中盤、藤本が「前回の放送で、先におこなわれた衆議院選挙に関するニュースを取り上げた際、比例代表東京ブロックにおける政党ごとの得票率を紹介しました。この一覧表に、日本保守党と減税日本・ゆうこく連合が記載されていませんでした」と、記載漏れを謝罪。正しい表を映しながら、今後の再発防止を徹底することを表明した。　ただ、放送後のXでは 《宮根さんは謝らないのね。頭下げるくらいしてもいいのでは》 《「はい、次はこちらです」じゃ、ねーよ。ひとごとか？宮根？》 《藤本万梨乃アナのお詫びが言い終わらないうちに宮根誠司が「さあ続いては」とかぶせたのは駄目だろう》 　など、宮根に厳しい声が聞かれていた。宮根の“他人事態度”が波紋を呼んでいるようだ。「藤本さんが『再発防止を徹底してまいります』と言って頭を下げたのですが、宮根さんは謝罪せず、彼女が頭を上げる前に『はい、続いてはこちらです』と、被せるようにミラノ・コルティナ五輪の話題に移行したのです。今回の件は、宮根さんに問題があったわけではありませんが、番組の司会者として謝らず、何事もなかったかのように進行する様子に違和感を覚える人が多かったようです」（芸能記者） 　宮根は『情報ライブ ミヤネ屋』（読売テレビ制作、日本テレビ系）と『Mr.サンデー』でMCを務め、情報番組の顔として広く認知されている。ただ、“謝り方”が物議を醸したのは、今回が初めてではない。「2024年3月の『ミヤネ屋』で、宮根さんは韓国で開催されたメジャーリーグの取材の際、喫煙禁止区域で喫煙したことを謝罪しました。

三 | 『周りの方々、それから多くの方々にご不快な思い、ご迷惑をおかけしました』と述べながら頭を下げたのですが、宮根さんはスタジオのセットである机に手を大きく広げたままだったのです。　この態度に関して、SNSで『机に手をついて偉そうに謝罪してる人の態度じゃないよ』と批判の声があがってしまいました。今回の件もあわせると、番組の“顔”としての適性に疑問を持たれかねませんよ」（同前） 　MCとして、お茶の間から“支持”される言動を期待したいが……。

Current article:http://vtd2wz.recuigoutoubaozukai.pics/list_od4oi/jydj.html

Published on:00:00:00